This post was originally released by Pentair as a white paper.
Introduction
If one debate over a specific design feature stands out amongst all the others in the submersible waste water pump field, it must be, “Which is better, air-filled or oil-filled motors”? With the introduction of premium efficient motors by several manufactures, this topic has come to the forefront once again. Each design has specific advantages. However, the advantages of an oil-filled design out-weigh those of an air-filled design.
Cooling
The NEMA MG-1 Standard specifies that a submersible totally enclosed non-ventilated motor (TENV) with IP68 rating
is cooled by its surrounding pumped media (NEMA MG1 5.2, 6.2.5 and 6.2.6). For the heat generated by the motor
windings to get to the cooling medium, it must pass from the inner working parts of the motor to the outer shell. Both
air-filled and oil filled motors rely on a great extent upon convection to transfer heat from the rotor core, motor
windings and laminations to the outer shell. The heat convection process uses oil as the transfer media in an oil filled
motor and air as the transfer media in an air-filled motor.
Since oil has from 5 to 7 times the thermal conductivity of air, it follows that oil filled motors pass internal thermal
energy to the cooling medium much more efficiently than do air-filled motors.
Additionally, in higher efficiency motors, since a greater portion of the input energy is converted to work, rather than
waste heat, a premium efficient motor CAN be designed to operate at cooler temperatures.
Traditionally, the benefits of oil cooled motors have taken a back seat to efficiency, since it was a commonly held
belief that an oil filled motor could not be designed to meet premium efficiency standards. Hydromatic has been able
to overcome the design hurdles to introduce their new HPE series of premium efficient submersible motors.
For each 10 degree C that a motor operates below its maximum design operating temperature, life expectancy is
approximately doubled. Conversely, for each 10 degrees C a motor is operated beyond its designed operating
temperature, its life expectancy is cut in half. Hydromatic’s oil-filled motor design operates at temperatures
significantly cooler than their designed maximum operating temperature. This translates into greatly extended motor
life expectancy. For example: Hydromatic’s HPE Series premium efficient submersible oil-filled motors are equipped
with Class H (180 C) insulation systems. These motors actually operate in the Class A temperature range (less than
105 C) at about 68 C. Most air-filled submersible motors are also equipped with Class H or F insulation systems.
However, these motors operate at or near their design temperature, (155 to 180 C). No gain in life expectancy can be
realized due to inefficient cooling. Oil-filled premium efficient motors offer greater life expectancy which translates
into lower overall costs to the user.
Lubrication
Another advantage that oil-filled motors offer over air filled motors is their inherent self-lubrication. The oil used as a
cooling medium also lubricates the bearings and seals. Air filled motors utilize sealed or shielded bearings which
require periodic re-packing of their lubricating grease. Oil-filled motors do not require periodic replacement of the
cooling oil. It should be only be necessary to replace the oil if water enters the motor via a faulty seal or some other
repairs are required. This translates into lower overall costs to the user.
Perceived Disadvantage
Many air filled submersible motor manufacturers proclaim their motors are inherently more efficient than their oilfilled
motor counter parts. Their reasoning is that oil-filled motors have additional viscous losses due to the motor
rotor running in oil. While it is true that in equal sized motors, viscous losses due to running in oil can range from 1 to
1.5 percent, what is more important is total motor efficiency. Hydromatic’s HPE premium efficient submersible motors
meet or exceed NEMA MG-1 and IEC 60034-30 level IE3 requirements for premium efficiency. Since oil-filled motors
run much cooler than air filled motors, with all other factors remaining the same, oil-filled motors can be designed to
run at better peak efficiencies than air filled motors. One only has to compare motor electrical data between air-filled
an oil-filled designs to be convinced of this fact.
Conclusion
Oil-filled motors can offer cooler operation, continuous lubrication and better overall efficiencies than similar air-filled
motors. The end user benefits from lower operating and maintenance costs over the useful life of the motor.
For more information, or for information on operating Hydromatic HPE series premium efficient submersible motors
in conjunction with VFD’s, contact: Kevin Clemons, Senior System Applications Engineer, Pentair Flow Technologies at
419.281.9200 or Kevin.clemons@pentair.com .